How Does A Joint Check Agreement Work

2020 December 1

For example, a general contractor may have a joint audit agreement with a subcontractor. However, the general contractor can then recover the counter-actions against the subcontractor or claim that the subcontractor never entered into his contract. If the general contractor is not required to pay the subcontractor, the general contractor is not required to write a cheque and the joint audit agreement is not enforced. Since a joint audit agreement is a multi-party contract, there are no statutes or regulations covering the details. It also means that there are standards for the details of common control agreements and, like all contracts, they must be written, agreed upon by all parties and include some sort of exchange, usually work or deliveries for payment. In the absence of a common audit agreement, a general contractor or developer generally cannot submit a trial at a lower level. Instead, they must follow the standard payment model (the payment of their contractor and the confidence that the contractor pays the people on the line). The conclusion of a joint cheque contract, in which the client gives permission to pay lower echelons for a common cheque, gives the general payer additional power to control the payment flow. The general contractor challenged the signing of a JCA. They insist on making common checks to us if the supplier moves forward (what we are our company, the subcontractor).

Please specify if we need a certain type or way for the GC for each billing or once… Another situation may arise if the payer issues the cheque without your company in violation of a joint audit agreement. This may happen accidentally or intentionally. Nevertheless, this is a violation of the Common Control Agreement, and if the parties do not cooperate to resolve the issue, the paying party may hesitate to write you another cheque and pay for the work or equipment twice. This means that there is no standard common verification agreement. Subcontractors are under pressure to obtain materials to carry out their work on time and on budget. If a hardware supplier refuses to provide enough credit to do the work, it could put the subcontractor in a desperate situation. The solution to their problem could be a common control agreement.

But what happens if the general contractor refuses to accept? What dictates whether the paid party has to perform common checks or only? The common control agreement, of course. Eugene (“Gene”) J. Heady is a partner at Smith, Currie and Hancock`s Atlanta Bureau. He was considered by Martindale-Hubbell as the VA® Preeminent™ and was voted one of the best georgia lawyers of 2014. Smith, Currie-Hancock is a national law firm focused on construction law, state treaties, environmental law and commercial litigation. Gene is also a mediator and arbitrator and is a member of the American Arbitration Association`s national panel of construction arbitrators. Gene is a regular contributor to the Construction Connection newsletter. He has more than 30 years of experience as a problem solver in the construction industry.

Comments are closed for this entry.