Karachi Agreement Gilgit Baltistan Pdf

2020 December 11

Christopher Snedden says the Azad Kashmir government and the Muslim Conference have accepted the deal because they wanted Azad Kashmir to join Pakistan, which they were expecting soon with the promised referendum. According to him, this relationship was similar to that of Pakistan with its other provinces. [6] However, Navnita Behera says that the joint secretary of the Kashmir ministry following the agreement has acquired “the best claim to be the true head of government of Asad Kashmir”. [7] Despite Pakistan`s protests to the contrary, it is clear that the abrupt decision to change the status of the United Kingdom was made because of the amendment to the Indian Constitution of August 2019 in the Kashmir Valley, which allowed Indian citizens to buy land and property there and integrate into the local population. Islamabad called India`s action a “clear violation of UN Security Council resolutions, bilateral agreements between Pakistan and India and international law.” Khan accused Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi`s Bharatiya Janata party of abusing his majority in parliament to change the demographic structure of the disputed territory and make Die Kaschmiris a minority in his own country, which would amount to a “war crime.” India`s unilateral action, which it describes as an internal matter, has put Pakistan in an embarrassing position by not providing much international support for its attitude towards Kashmir. From the Pakistani point of view, the acquisition of GB would be an appropriate response and indeed seems to be well suited. Part I of the agreement relates to the structure and operation of the “civil administration of the territory of Azad Kashmir,” which set the rules applicable to the cashmere Azad government. The second part dealt with financial arrangements that would allow Pakistan to present money. Part III is entitled “Division of Functions between the Governments of Pakistan, the Government of Azad Kashmir and the Muslim Conference.” [4] With regard to the loss of Gilgit-Baltistan, Snedden Sardar accepts the argument that Azad Kashmir`s physical ties to Gilgit-Baltistan are weak. It was expected that Pakistan would manage it more easily via Peshawar or Rawalpindi. [6] However, in the years that followed, Azad Kaschmir tried to regain control of Gilgit-Baltistan through various means.

In 1972, the Azad Kashmir Legislative Assembly passed a resolution on the recovery of Gilgit-Baltistan. The intermediate constitution of Azad Kashmir, formulated in 1974, lists gilgit-Baltistan as part of Azad Kashmir. In 1992, the Azad Kashmir High Court admitted a petition and ordered that the government of Azad Kashmir take control of Gilgit-Baltistan. However, the order was challenged in the Supreme Court of Azad Kashmir, which overturned it, although he claimed that gilgit-Baltistan was part of Jammu and Kashmir. [8] The people of Gilgit-Baltistan would have been outraged by the Karachi agreement because there were no representatives of them who thought that the agreement was the fate of Gilgit-Baltistan. [9] According to Christopher Snedden, the agreement was very favourable to Pakistan and deprived Azad Kashmiris of considerable powers and responsibilities. [3] The agreement was apparently kept as a secret document until the 1990s.

Comments are closed for this entry.